Metal Foam Protects From Fire and Heat Twice as Well as Plain Metal

Afsaneh Rabiei examines a sample of composite metal foam. Click to enlarge.

A new study from North Carolina State University researchers finds that novel light-weight composite metal foams (CMFs) are significantly more effective at insulating against high heat than the conventional base metals and alloys that they’re made of, such as steel. The finding means the CMF is especially promising for use in storing and transporting nuclear material, hazardous materials, explosives and other heat-sensitive materials, as well as for space exploration.

“The presence of air pockets inside CMF make it so effective at blocking heat, mainly because heat travels more slowly through air than through metal,” says Afsaneh Rabiei, a professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at NC State and corresponding author of a paper on the work. The composite metal foam consists of metallic hollow spheres – made of materials such as carbon steel, stainless steel or titanium – embedded in a metallic matrix made of steel, aluminum or metallic alloys.

“We have developed two technologies for manufacturing CMFs,” Rabiei says. “One is based on casting a low melting point matrix material, such as aluminum, around hollow spheres made of a material with a higher melting point, such as steel. This creates aluminum-steel CMFs, for example. The other technique is based on sintering, or baking, the matrix powder around prefabricated hollow spheres. This creates CMFs such as steel-steel, which consist of steel hollow spheres in a steel matrix.”

In one test, researchers exposed samples of 2.5 inch by 2.5 inch steel-steel CMF that were 0.75 inches thick to a fire with an average flame temperature of 800 degrees Celsius for a period of 30 minutes on one side, and monitored the material to see how long it would take for the heat to reach the opposite side of the sample. For a piece of bulk stainless steel with the same dimensions as the CMF sample, it took only four minutes to reach 800 degrees Celsius through the entire thickness of the sample. But it took eight minutes for the steel-steel CMF to reach the same temperature.

“We already knew the CMFs are light-weight materials with outstanding high-velocity impact resistance, and effective radiation shielding, now we know that it can withstand high heat,” Rabiei says. “This difference in thermal conductivity means that the use of composite metal foams could help avoid circumstances where accidents can lead to explosions.”

The researchers also found that the composite metal foam made entirely of stainless steel expands 80 percent less than bulk stainless steel at 200 degrees Celsius – and the differential increases at higher temperatures. Another noteworthy advantage is that the composite metal foam expands at a fairly constant rate when exposed to high heat – whereas conventional bulk metals and alloys such as stainless steel expand more rapidly as temperature increases.

“Our findings suggest that CMF can offer extremely good thermal insulation, superior thermal stability, and excellent flame retardant performances as compared to commercially available materials such as stainless steel,” Rabiei says.

The paper, “Experimental and computational studies on the thermal behavior and fire retardant properties of composite metal foams,” is published in the International Journal of Thermal Sciences. Lead author of the paper is Shuo Chen, a former Ph.D. student at NC State. The paper was co-authored by Jacob Marx, a Ph.D. student at NC State. The work was supported by the Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy’s Nuclear Energy University Programs grant number CFP-11-1643.


Note to Editors: The study abstract follows.

“Experimental and computational studies on the thermal behavior and fire retardant properties of composite metal foams”

Authors: Shuo Chen, Jacob Marx and Afsaneh Rabiei, North Carolina State University

Published: published online March 26, International Journal of Thermal Sciences

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2016.03.005

Abstract: A comprehensive experimental and computational evaluation of thermal behavior and fire retardant properties of composite metal foams (CMFs) is reported in this study. Thermal behavior characterizations were carried out through specific heat capacity, effective thermal conductivity, and coefficient of thermal expansion analyses using differential scanning calorimetry, high temperature guarded-comparative-longitudinal heat flow technique, and thermomechanical analyzer (TMA), respectively. The experimental results were compared with analytical results obtained from respectively rule of mixture, Brailsford and Major’s model, and modified Turner’s model for verification. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) standard were employed as regulatory standard and criteria for fire retardant property study. The results revealed a superior thermal resistance and fire survivability of CMFs compared to 304L stainless steel. A physics-based three-dimensional model accounting for heat conduction was built using Finite Element Analysis to validate the reliability of the experimental results. The model led to a good reproduction of the experimentally measured data when comparing CMF to bulk stainless steel. This research indicates that one of the potential applications of lightweight CMFs can be in nuclear spent fuel casks replacing conventional structural and radiation shielding materials with demonstrated benefits of excellent thermal isolation, fire retardant, light weight and energy absorption capabilities.

12 responses on “Metal Foam Protects From Fire and Heat Twice as Well as Plain Metal

  1. Andrew Misner says:

    I’m wondering if this material would be good for a refractory lining to protect from heat from a heat treating oven, or metal melting furnace? What would the maximum temp that this can withstand?

  2. Jimmy Rowell says:

    Is there a company manufacturing this product?

  3. A. Visitor' says:

    Good Day and congratulations on your creation!
    As you reach out into the various directions for its potential uses, what are the minimum thicknesses for: fire / heat / chem resistance? Looking at “fabric” functionality aspects – flexibility / durability / stress – flex – failure curves / chemical retention (bubbles open or closed) / effects to the “other properties” discussed / reviewed? Minimum thicknesses for long work life vs weight (aircraft transport)?
    Thank You and wish you the best with your research!

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.