Skip to main content
News Releases

Gut Microbiomes Help Bears With Very Different Diets Reach the Same Size

a mother bear and cub rest on a beach
Photo credit:

For Immediate Release

Erin McKenney
Grant Hilderbrand
Diana Lafferty

A recent study of the gut microbiome of Alaskan brown bears (Ursus arctos) shows that the microbial life in bears’ guts allows them to achieve comparable size and fat stores while eating widely different diets. The work sheds light on the role of the gut microbiome in supporting health in wild omnivores.

“We think of bears as having simple digestive tracts, so it’s easy to slip into thinking that they therefore have simple gut microbiomes,” says Erin McKenney, co-author of the study and an assistant professor of applied ecology at North Carolina State University. “But this study shows there can be tremendous diversity in the gut microbiomes between individual bears, and that this variation can be very important to the physical condition of these animals.”

“For example, the amount of fat that bears are able to store is absolutely critical to the health of wild populations,” says Grant Hilderbrand, co-author of the study and associate regional director for resources for the National Park Service in Alaska. “If female bears are able to reach levels where 19-20% of their body mass in the autumn is fat, they’ll reproduce. And knowing that they can take different dietary paths to reach those fat levels is a valuable insight.”

For this study, researchers collected fecal samples from 51 adult brown bears in three national parks: Katmai National Park and Preserve, Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, and Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve.

Previous research has demonstrated that the diets of bears in each park vary. Bears at Lake Clark generally eat a lot of berries, salmon and mammals, such as moose. Bears at Gates of the Arctic tend to eat seasonal vegetation and mammals, but have less access to fish. And bears on the coast of Katmai have the most diverse nutritional landscape, including a variety of vegetation, fish, and a wide range of marine species.

“The fact that these populations have distinct diets is valuable, because it allows us to understand the role that the gut microbiome plays in helping bears extract nutrition from very different food sources,” says Sarah Trujillo, corresponding author of the study and a former graduate student at Northern Michigan University (NMU).

“We found that bears benefit from having diverse dietary niches, and the gut microbiome does play a role in extracting nutrition from those diets,” Trujillo says. “Ultimately, that means that the bears in these parks were able to achieve very similar body conditions, despite eating very different things.”

“And because the parks are protected, well-conserved environments, this study can serve as a baseline for future research,” says Diana Lafferty, co-author of the study and an assistant professor of biology at NMU. “For example, researchers will be able to compare the gut microbiomes of bears in more disturbed systems – such as areas where bears have more access to garbage and human foods – to the data from this study.”

“This study is also important because it gives us a snapshot of bears and their diet in these parks,” Hilderbrand says. “The biggest conservation challenge we’re facing right now is climate change, and understanding what is happening now will help us identify and understand any changes that will take place moving forward.

“Knowing what bears are eating, and that these diverse diets can all be used to reach similar body conditions, can help us spot emerging challenges for these animals. It can also help us understand how many bears these ecosystems are capable of supporting, even as those ecosystems change.”

“In short, this study has given us significant insights into both the park ecosystems that these bears inhabit, and the microbial ecosystems that help these bears thrive,” McKenney says.

The study, “Correlating gut microbial membership to brown bear health metrics,” is published in the open-access journal Scientific Reports. The paper was co-authored by Kyle Joly and Buck Mangipane of the National Park Service; Lindsey Mangipane, David Gustine and Joy Erlenbach of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and Matthew Rogers of the National Marine Fisheries Service.

The work was made possible by research funding from NMU.


Note to Editors: The study abstract follows.

“Correlating gut microbial membership to brown bear health metrics”

Authors: Sarah M. Trujillo and Diana J. R. Lafferty, Northern Michigan University; Erin A. McKenney, North Carolina State University; Grant V. Hilderbrand, Kyle Joly and Buck A. Mangipane, National Park Service; Lindsey S. Mangipane, David D. Gustine and Joy A. Erlenbach, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and Matthew C. Rogers, National Marine Fisheries Service

Published: Sept. 22, Scientific Reports

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19527-4

Abstract: The internal mechanisms responsible for modulating physiological condition, particularly those performed by the gut microbiome (GMB), remain under-explored in wildlife. However, as latitudinal and seasonal shifts in resource availability occur, the myriad micro-ecosystem services facilitated by the GMB may be especially important to wildlife health and resilience. Here, we use brown bears (Ursus arctos) as an ecological model to quantify the relationship between wildlife body condition metrics that are commonly used to assess individual and population-level health and GMB community composition and structure. To achieve these aims, we subsampled brown bear fecal samples collected during United States National Park Service research activities at three National Parks and Preserves (Katmai, Lake Clark, and Gates of the Arctic) and extracted microbial DNA for 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and microbial taxonomic classification. We analyzed GMB communities using alpha diversity indices, subsequently using Spearman’s correlation analysis to examine relationships between alpha diversity and brown bear health metrics. We found no differences in GMB composition among bears with differing body conditions, nor any correlations between alpha diversity and body condition. Our results indicate that GMB composition reflects diverse foraging strategies while allowing brown bears to achieve similar body condition outcomes.